Alpine’s recent driver lineup choices and strategic decisions have sent shockwaves through the Formula 1 community, leaving many questioning the team’s long-term vision and stability. The promotion of young Argentine driver Franco Colapinto, coupled with the apparent sidelining of Jack Doohan, has ignited controversy and raised serious questions about Alpine’s driver development program and overall management.

The decision to place Colapinto, a promising talent but relatively inexperienced compared to others in the Alpine Academy, on the path to F1 has been met with mixed reactions. While many acknowledge his potential and appreciate the opportunity given to a driver from South America, concerns have been raised about whether he’s truly ready for the immense pressure and complexity of F1. This move effectively pushes him ahead of others in the academy, sparking debate over the criteria used for selection. Some speculate that Colapinto’s connections and sponsorships played a significant role in his accelerated trajectory.

The more controversial aspect is the apparent treatment of Jack Doohan. The son of motorcycle racing legend Mick Doohan, Jack has long been considered a frontrunner for a future F1 seat with Alpine. He possesses significant experience in Formula 2 and has impressed in testing sessions. However, recent reports suggest a growing disconnect between Doohan and the team, with speculation that he’s being increasingly sidelined in favor of other drivers. The term “exposed from the track” implies a deliberate strategy to limit his opportunities and diminish his chances of securing an F1 drive, potentially pushing him towards exploring options outside the Alpine ecosystem.

What are the underlying reasons behind this seemingly perplexing decision? Several factors are likely at play:

• Performance Pressure: Alpine is under immense pressure to improve its on-track performance and challenge for podium finishes. The team may be prioritizing drivers they believe can deliver immediate results, even if it means sacrificing the long-term development of promising talents like Doohan.

• Internal Politics and Power Struggles: The management structure within Alpine has been unstable in recent years, with frequent personnel changes and internal power struggles. These conflicts can influence driver selection and development decisions, potentially leading to choices that aren’t solely based on merit.

• Financial Considerations: Securing sponsorship and investment is crucial for any F1 team. Colapinto’s potential to attract funding from South American backers could be a significant factor in his promotion, while Doohan may lack the same level of financial support.

• The Piastri Debacle: Last year’s Oscar Piastri saga, where the young Australian driver rejected Alpine’s F1 seat offer, has left a lingering scar. The team is likely wary of investing too heavily in drivers who may ultimately choose to leave, prompting them to explore alternative options and potentially prioritize drivers who are perceived as more loyal and committed.

The consequences of these decisions could be significant. Alpine risks alienating a talented driver in Doohan, potentially losing him to a rival team. The controversy surrounding Colapinto’s promotion could also damage the team’s reputation and raise questions about the fairness and transparency of its driver development program. Furthermore, a perceived lack of commitment to young driver development could dissuade future talents from joining the Alpine Academy.

Ultimately, Alpine’s recent decisions are a high-stakes gamble. While the team may believe they are taking the necessary steps to improve their performance and secure their future, they also risk alienating valuable talent and damaging their long-term prospects. The truth, as always, will be revealed on the track. The performance of Colapinto and the future trajectory of Doohan will ultimately determine whether Alpine’s controversial decisions were a stroke of genius or a costly mistake.