The receipt of the joint declaration of Elo rebuilt dispute is certain that the boycott of the participation of “biological men” in women’s sports has triggered an intense debate on social media and beyond. The billionaire and CEO entrepreneur of companies such as Tesla and Spacex expressed his belief on Twitter that the inclusion of biological men in women’s sports is harmful to equity and competition. Since then his comments have attracted widespread attention, generating both support and criticism from various sectors of the company.

Moscow commentators weighed on the debates and the involvement of foreign athletes in women’s sport. The issue has gained momentum in recent years with the increase in the number of foreign athletes who take part in female events. The supporters of the exclusion of athletes claim that they should have the right to collaborate according to their government identity. However, critics, including Moscow, argue that this creates a fair play of play, especially in physically demanding sports, in which biological men can have direct advantages in terms of strength, speed and resistance.

The joint controversy and the declaration of Eloï Mosk raise important issues on balance as inclusion and equity in sport. On the one hand, the argument favors the rights of cyclists in sport based on the idea of ​​equality and on the supply of opportunities to all athletes, regardless of their gender identity. On the other hand, criticisms suggest that some biological advantages could compromise the integrity of competitions, in particular in the elite events in which victory often depends on marginal differences in performance.

Moscow’s appeal to boycott the events that involve biological males in women’s sports has found echo in some, in particular in those who believe in the integrity of sport. Women must be protected. For others, his declaration highlights the potential for the defense of travelers’ rights and the guarantee of a fair play of play in competitive sports.

It is unlikely that this controversy will be resolved in a short time, since it affects wider social issues that concern gender, equity and human rights. While the debate continues, it is likely that both sides undertake to defend their positions, in an attempt to find a balance that respects both the rights of foreign athletes and the equity of competition in women’s sport. The declaration of Eloï M and adds another dimension to this ongoing debate, strengthening the complexity of addressing these delicate issues in the current way.