Ferrari’s shocking statement after Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton were disqualified from the Chinese Formula 1 Grand Prix—an unprecedented event in history.

Ferrari’s Historic Double Disqualification at Chinese Grand Prix Sparks Shock Statement
Ferrari faced an unprecedented double blow at the Chinese Formula 1 Grand Prix, becoming the first team in history to have both drivers—Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton—disqualified from the same race. After crossing the finish line in fifth and sixth at the Shanghai International Circuit, the duo was stripped from the results due to distinct technical violations. Ferrari issued a candid statement addressing the debacle, revealing the missteps that led to their dramatic exclusion and vowing to learn from the costly errors.

Leclerc’s car was found to be 1kg under the minimum weight limit, while Hamilton’s Ferrari suffered excessive wear on its rear skid block, measuring 0.5mm below the mandated threshold. Both infractions breached the FIA’s stringent technical regulations, erasing what initially appeared to be a solid points haul for the Scuderia. The disqualifications handed McLaren’s Oscar Piastri an unchallenged victory and reshaped the race standings, with Mercedes’ George Russell and Red Bull’s Max Verstappen climbing the order.

A Historic First for Ferrari
This marks the first time Ferrari has endured a double disqualification in a single Grand Prix, a stark contrast to their storied legacy. For Hamilton, it’s his third career disqualification, following incidents at the 2009 Australian GP and the 2023 US GP—the latter of which also saw Leclerc excluded for brake issues. The Shanghai fallout adds a new chapter to Ferrari’s 2025 season woes, exposing vulnerabilities as they integrate Hamilton, who joined from Mercedes ahead of the year.

Ferrari’s full statement, shared with outlets like RacingNews365, laid bare the team’s errors: “After the FIA’s post-race inspection, both our cars failed to comply with regulations for different reasons. Car 16 (Leclerc) was 1kg underweight, and the rear skid wear on Car 44 (Hamilton) was 0.5mm below the limit.” The team attributed Leclerc’s violation to his one-stop strategy, which caused excessive tire wear and unintended weight loss. Hamilton’s issue, meanwhile, stemmed from a slight miscalculation of skid consumption.

Ferrari’s Mea Culpa
“There was no intent to gain an advantage,” Ferrari emphasized, dispelling any suspicion of foul play. “We’ll take lessons from today and ensure these mistakes don’t happen again. This isn’t how we wanted to end the Chinese GP—not for ourselves or our fans who always support us.” The admission reflects Ferrari’s determination to rebound, but the damage was undeniable: a lost opportunity to close the gap on rivals like McLaren and Red Bull.

The disqualifications came nearly three hours after the race, amplifying the shock within the paddock. Leclerc’s underweight car and Hamilton’s worn skid block—measured at 8.5mm to 8.6mm against the required 9mm—left no room for leniency under FIA scrutiny. The rulings also echoed Alpine’s Pierre Gasly’s exclusion for a similar weight breach, underscoring the governing body’s zero-tolerance stance.
A Missed Opportunity in Shanghai
On the track, Ferrari had shown promise. Leclerc’s fifth and Hamilton’s sixth-place finishes suggested a competitive outing, especially after Hamilton’s Sprint win the previous day. However, the post-race rulings turned a potential double-points finish into a double-zero scoreline. McLaren capitalized fully, with Piastri dominating from start to finish, while teammate Lando Norris battled brake issues but avoided technical penalties.

George Russell inherited a podium spot in third, followed by Verstappen in fourth and Esteban Ocon in fifth. The reshuffled order highlighted Ferrari’s misfortune, as their errors gifted rivals a free pass up the standings. For Hamilton, adapting to Ferrari’s car in his second race with the team, the disqualification compounded a challenging Sunday after voicing frustration with the car’s performance.

Fallout and Future Focus
Ferrari’s statement signals a commitment to improvement, but the Shanghai debacle raises questions about their technical precision. Leclerc’s one-stop gamble and Hamilton’s skid misjudgment reflect the fine margins in F1, where small oversights carry massive consequences. The team’s fans, accustomed to seeing the Prancing Horse compete at the front, were left disappointed by a result that fell far short of expectations.

As the 2025 season progresses, Ferrari must regroup to challenge McLaren, Mercedes, and Red Bull. For Hamilton, the disqualification is a setback in his quest to reclaim championship glory with his new team. The Chinese GP will linger as a historic low point—a rare double disqualification that stunned the F1 world. Can Ferrari turn this embarrassment into motivation? The paddock watches closely as the Scuderia aims to rewrite the narrative in the races ahead.

 
 

Related Posts

Denis Arndt, Tony-Nominated Star of ‘Heisenberg’ and Actor in David E. Kelley Shows, Dies at 86

Denis Arndt, the versatile character actor celebrated for roles in L.A. Law, Picket Fences, and his Tony-nominated Broadway debut in Heisenberg, has passed away at 86. Arndt died on Tuesday…

Read more

🚨 EXPLOSIVE CLASH! Oprah Winfrey SLAMS Elon Musk as a ‘FRAUD’ on Live TV – Musk’s SHOCKING REACTION STUNS the Studio, FORCING Oprah into an IMMEDIATE PUBLIC APOLOGY! 🔥😱

In a shocking moment of live television, Oprah Winfrey ignited controversy when she publicly called Elon Musk a “fraud” during an appearance on The View. The unexpected remark left the…

Read more

Box Office Upset: Blue-Collar Drama ‘A Working Man’ Declares Victory Over ‘Snow White’

Disney isn’t standing down just yet, and says the race is too early to call even if the troubled movie is falling off a steep 65 percent or more in…

Read more

University of Texas Withdraws Scholarships from All Students Who Kneel During National Anthem

The University of Texas (UT) has recently found itself at the heart of a national controversy following reports that it revoked scholarships from five athletes who knelt during the National…

Read more

Voters think Keir Starmer should do this instead of cosying up to Donald Trump

A YouGov poll found Brits preferred almost anything to cosying up to Donald Trump – but one option got three times as many people excited as a deal with the…

Read more

ロワール川が明かす恐ろしい秘密:巨大な蛇の骨格が科学者を困惑させる

2025年3月、フランスのロワール川で驚くべき発見が発表された。巨大な蛇の骨格が発掘され、考古学や古生物学の専門家たちを困惑させている。この壮観な発見は、一般的な情報収集のための発掘作業から始まったものではなく、思いがけない形で世界に衝撃を与えた。発掘作業は2024年10月に始まり、当初は地元の農民が持ち込んだガロ・ローマ時代の遺構を探る目的だった。しかし、調査員たちが直面したのは、完璧に直線状に並んだ巨大な亀裂と、それが形成する脊椎の構造だった。 巨大蛇の驚くべき特徴 この骨格は全長15~18メートルと推定され、現代の蛇のサイズを大きく超える。繊細な肋骨、幅広い顎、そして湾曲した歯が発掘現場で確認され、絶滅した巨大爬虫類である可能性が高いとされている。ナント大学の初期分析によると、この生物は約4000万年前の始新世に生息していたとみられ、当時のフランスは現在よりもはるかに温暖な亜熱帯気候だった。この時代は巨大な爬虫類が繁栄するのに最適な環境で、コロンビアで発見された「ティタノボア」(全長約13メートル)と比較されるが、ロワール川での発見はその存在がヨーロッパ西部にまで及ぶことを示唆している。 なぜロワール川に? ロワール川の堆積物からは、当時この地域が湿地平原、川辺、そして密林に覆われていたことが分かっている。古生物学者のマリー・ルクレール氏は「始新世のフランスは高温多湿で、爬虫類にとって理想的な生息地だった」と説明する。骨の一部には争いの痕跡が残っており、野生で過酷な生活を送っていた証拠と考えられる。南米の熱帯地域とは異なるロワール川での出現は、専門家たちを驚かせ、爬虫類の移動や適応に関する新たな議論を巻き起こしている。 科学と大衆の反応 この発見は即座に一般の注目を集めた。2025年2月、ロワール川支流のロワレ湖畔に部分的に埋まった骨格の写真がソーシャルメディアで拡散し、「ドラゴン」や「伝説の怪物」と題したセンセーショナルな見出しが飛び交った。科学者たちはこうした幻想的な解釈を否定する一方で、この発見が先史時代のヨーロッパの生態系解明に寄与する可能性を認めている。ルクレール氏は「この地域の大型爬虫類についてはほとんど知られていない。この標本はパズルの重要なピースだ」と語る。 さらなる調査と展示 現在、この骨格はパリの特別な研究所で詳細に調査中だ。研究者たちは同位体分析や3D再構築を用いて、その食性、生息環境、死因を解明しようとしている。一つの仮説として、大規模な洪水で急速に埋没した可能性が挙げられ、それが驚異的な保存状態を説明する。また、茶褐色の化石は高度に化石化しているが、一部はまだ有機物を保持している。この発見は、ロワール川だけでなくヨーロッパ全体での爬虫類の進化や気候変動への適応に関する疑問を投げかけている。最終的な調査結果は2025年末に国立自然史博物館での展示で公開され、多くの来場者が期待されている。 ロワール川の新たな歴史 ルネサンス期の城や中世の遺産で知られるロワール川流域に、巨大爬虫類の痕跡が加わったことは驚くべき展開だ。地元住民はこれを「ロワールの怪物」と呼び、軍事的な創造物にちなんで名付けた。公式なものではないが、この発見は人類の想像力と太古の現実をつなぐ魅力的な出来事として語り継がれるだろう。ロワール川の歴史の一部が解き明かされた今、私たちはこの地域の過去に隠されたさらなる秘密に思いを馳せずにはいられない。 まとめ ロワール川での巨大蛇の骨格発見は、科学と神秘の境界を揺さぶる出来事だ。この驚異的な化石は、過去の生態系や気候を理解する手がかりとなり、さらなる研究のきっかけとなるだろう。あなたはこの発見をどう思うだろうか?ロワールの深淵に眠る歴史が、今後も私たちを驚かせ続けるかもしれない。

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *